Testing cosmetics on animals is related to many aspects of the product’s manufacturing process, occurring on the individual ingredients within the formula or on the finished product. Though you have heard some good news about this method, it has become one of the most controversial topics the world has ever had. It was already banned in the UK, but it still does occur in other countries. The European Union has even introduced a testing and marketing ban in 2009.
Now, both sides of this argument are firmly entrenched in their beliefs, making it difficult for them to reach any agreement. There are positives and negatives on each side, so the best way to come up with a well-informed decision about it is taking a closer look at its pros and cons. List of Pros of Animal Testing on Cosmetics 1. It aids research.Without the ability to test cosmetics on animals before being released to consumers, it would be difficult for researchers to make an educated guess about these products’ safety.
But with animal testing, developers of these products are able to conduct trial and error to learn more about providing consumers with the best possible goods. 2. It helps improves human health.With this method, people are assured of never being exposed to any harmful toxins or chemicals, leading to a drop in health risks for consumers. Now, scientists argue that testing cosmetics on animals before introducing them to the public is needed for the process, or people would be exposed to products that are potentially harmful.
3. It gives benefits to companies that are performing it.Firms that are participating in cosmetic tests on animals have a competitive edge over those that do not do it. Also, they feel that they are safeguarding the environment through the method. 4. It uses animals that are a close match to humans.Though animal composition is not completely similar to human beings, it is just sufficient for scientists to use on tests to see how cosmetics would work on humans.
While there are certain inherent limitations with this method, it is the best method until medical technology advances further. 5. It offers benefits to the animals themselves.Can you imagine if vaccines were not tested on animals? Millions of them would have died from distemper, rabies, leukemia, tetanus, infectious hepatitis virus, parvo or anthrax. Animal treatments that were developed using animal testing also include remedies for glaucoma and hip dysplasia, as well as pacemakers for heart disease.
Moreover, animal testing has also been instrumental in saving endangered species from extinction. Aside from all of these breakthroughs for animals, the method also helped produce medicines for humans. Thus, it should also be the same with animal testing on cosmetics. 6. It is highly regulated, with laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment.Aside from state and federal laws and guidelines, animal research is regulated by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) since 1966.
Aside from stipulating minimum housing standards for animal research subjects, this law also requires regular inspections by veterinarians. All proposals of using animals for research should be approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) that was set up by research facilities. [embedded content] List of Cons of Animal Testing on Cosmetics 1. It causes death of animals.While there are painless trials, where animals are able to return to wherever they came from afterwards, this does not always happens in all trials.
Take note that some animals are killed immediately after each trial. And in some cases, animals may suffer from chemical poisoning or injuries, which would force them to live the rest of their life in captivity. 2. It poses inhumane treatment.In cosmetics testing, animals would endure inhumane treatment, where they are being restrained. In the case of the Draize Test, for example, eyelids of the test rabbits were held back for at least 3 days during the test.
This practice has become particularly controversial because animals mostly experience suffering and discomfort, and would eventually die—all for the sake of aesthetics and “looking good”. It is this aspect of animal testing that has drawn an enormous amount of criticism, not just in the UK, but internationally. 3. It performs tests that are not necessary.Unfortunately, animal testing on cosmetics does not always lead to the release of new cosmetics.
In fact, there are tests done, without products actually put into use. Animals are just suffering and dying in vain by being subjects in dangerous tests that do not even have direct human benefits. Unless every product, which is being tested, is proven safe for public consumption, proponents of this method do not see the need for doing it. 4. It costs a lot of money.It is important to note that animal testing is not cheap.
Providing shelter, food and care for the animals is costly. Not only that, the procedure usually takes place over the course of several months, accumulating more expenses for firms relying on it. For the animals themselves, they often have to be purchased, which is another considerable cost. 5. It passes drugs that are not necessarily safe.This was certainly true by looking at the sleeping pill thalidomide in the 1950s, which caused thousands of babies to be born with severe deformities.
The drug was definitely tested on animals before it was released commercially. It was later found out that the drug did not result in birth defects unless it was administered at extremely high doses. Another case was that involving the arthritis drug Vioxx, which showed to protect the hearts of mice, yet went on to be the cause of tens of thousands of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before it was pulled from the market.
6. It is not proven as the main reason for medical breakthroughs.Many scientists stated that medical accomplishments that used animal testing may still have been made without such procedure. In fact, they said that there is no evidence that animal experiments were essential in attaining such advancements. If enough time, money and resources were dedicated to animal-free alternatives, other scientific solutions would have been found.
Conclusion Animal testing on cosmetics is undeniably a very controversial topic, where there are scientists who see some benefits, while others see it as unnecessary when there are alternative methods. Based on the pros and cons listed above, which side are you on? [embedded content]See Also: Detroit Lakes Animal Shelter
The zoo will be a great alternate spot if you would like for getting animals photographs with out getting a trip to safari in summer months. You can just take their pictures inside the harmless bench that is definitely obtainable in the vicinity of the cages. To help make you accomplishment in taking the images of animals you want, you may follow the subsequent guidelines.
Away from a jungle of rain-washed pines and junipers spearing the new blueness in the Florida sky, ran a little, tawny-haired boy. His bare feet, extending from his overalled legs, crackled in opposition to the fallen palmettos. He leaped in the air, flinging his arms towards a flock of white doves circling higher than him.
navajocodetalkersadmin on July 6, 2015 - 8:56 pm in Pros and Cons Every single ingredient that is used in cosmetics has been tested on animals. Animal testing is one of the most comprehensive and accurate ways to determine if a product is safe for human use or not, and in most cases animal testing results are required in order for a product to be put onto the market. While animal testing is done to protect the health of humans, many people are left wondering who is protecting the health of the animals that the tests are being conducted on.
This has been one of the biggest and long running debates in society, and some countries are beginning to take action. Do the benefits of testing cosmetics on animals truly outweigh the tremendous cost that we are taking on as a society? The Pros of Animal Testing on Cosmetics 1. It’s As Close As We Can GetThe animals that are used for animal testing have an incredibly close DNA makeup to humans.
Mice have 98 percent of the same DNA, while chimpanzees have an impressive 99 percent. This allows the ingredients and products to be tested on something that will provide accurate and conclusive results as to the safety of the product for human use without putting actual human lives in danger. 2. Protection of Human HealthWhy is animal testing done in the first place? To protect the over all health of humans and to accurately determine the effects that a product or substance will have.
This is the biggest advantages that cosmetic testing on animals provides, safety. They are able to effectively determine any problems that could cause major issues with eyes, skin, and over all health of the person using it. 3. Without It, We Would Go No WhereIn order for new products to be developed, or better ingredients to be used, testing must be done for it’s safety. This is currently done on animals because it is the safest way.
Without animal testing all innovation would stop in the cosmetic field, as well as the medical and many other fields. 4. No AlternativesThere are currently no efficient alternatives to animal testing. One way or the other testing on products must be done, especially when using ingredients that we do not have an extensive amount of knowledge on. Since there is no better way to do the testing, animal testing must continue to be done.
[embedded content] The Cons of Animal Testing on Cosmetics 1. It’s Inhumane, Plain and SimpleThe biggest issue that people have with the use of animals in cosmetic testing is just how inhumane the tests that are done on them truly are. Some of these tests involve having their eyes forced open for days at a time and injection of harmful things underneath their skin. These animals are bred for the sole purpose of being tested on and live a life of pain and captivity.
2. Just How Accurate Is It?Many people argue that animal’s skin is not close enough to humans to truly determine how safe a product would be. The blood vessels of animals are dispersed much differently, and reach differently than humans would. There is still a large amount of negative reactions to products that have been tested on animals and released into the market. 3. Expensive To DoCosts begin to add up when you truly think about animal testing.
These animals must be fed and housed for a very long time. The repeated use of ingredients also adds up quite a bit. It is believed that these additional costs that are incurred by the company to test their products on animals are then passed down to the consumer. 4. We Don’t Need MakeupCosmetics are not an essential part of living. Why would we sacrifice the safety, well being, and lives of so many innocent animals just so we can have new non essential items? This is thought to be a luxury that thousands of innocent animals are paying for each year.
5. Widely OpposedOne of the biggest problems that manufacturers take into effect when it comes to testing their products on animals is the wide spread opposition of the consumers. Animal cruelty, and testing, have become hot button issues that big companies do not want to get in the middle of. The loss of business has prompted quite a few companies to eliminate their use of animal testing. [embedded content] Important Facts About Animal Testing On Cosmetics The U.
S. Uses over 100 million animals to test on each and every year. Europe, Israel, and India have all banned the testing of animals in the cosmetic industry. Mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, snakes, primates, and dogs are just a few of the different type of animals that are used in cosmetic animal testing. Just a few of the big name brands that still test their products on animals are Avon, Dial, MAC, Rimmel, Cover Girl, Almay, OPI, Essie, Gilette, and Nuetrogena.
[embedded content] NEXT ARTICLEJuly 6, 2015 - 10:00 am PREVIOUS ARTICLEJuly 6, 2015 - 4:13 pm